Wyoming Sage-Grouse EO: 2026 Draft Changes
By: Ashley Noonan | Last updated: August 10, 2026
Greater sage-grouse in southwest Wyoming, Tom Koerner/USFWS, Public Domain, https://www.fws.gov/media/greater-sage-grouse-southwest-wyoming
The short version: Wyoming's draft 2026 Sage-Grouse Executive Order is not yet signed — the comment period closed July 31, and a final version is expected in roughly four months. The draft expands Core Population Areas to 15.8 million acres, covering about 90% of the state's sage-grouse population (up from 84%), adds a five-year map stability commitment, and tightens habitat definitions. Development stipulations aren't loosening — if anything, the map expansion adds conservatism for projects near existing Core Area edges.
Governor Gordon's office has released a draft revision to Wyoming's Greater Sage-Grouse Core Area Protection strategy, which will replace the current Executive Order 2019-3 once finalized. For operators working in or near Wyoming's Core Population Areas, this is a rulemaking worth watching closely — below, we break down what's actually changing, what's staying the same, and what it means for projects currently in planning.
Draft order source: Wyoming Game & Fish Department – Sage-Grouse Executive Order
Current Status
- The public comment period on the proposed revisions closed July 31, 2026.
- The order remains in draft form — Executive Order 2019-3 is still the controlling authority for all current permitting.
- Based on the timeline for the last major revision in 2019, we anticipate a signed final version in approximately four months, likely around late 2026.
- We're monitoring for the signed version and will update this page as soon as it's finalized.
What's Changing — Substantive Revisions
New Habitat Categories
EO 2019-3 was built primarily around a Core / Non-Core distinction. The draft formalizes three additional categories — Connectivity Areas, Winter Concentration Areas, and a new Stewardship Area designation (fragmented, largely private/mixed-ownership habitat, managed similarly to Non-Core) — each with its own stipulation set.
Core Area Map Expansion
Core Population Areas grow from roughly 15 million acres (~84% of the state's sage-grouse population) to approximately 15.8 million acres, covering roughly 90% of the population. This reflects map revisions that have been in development since 2023–2024, including new acreage in the Powder River Basin and Moneta area, alongside some retractions elsewhere.
Five-Year Map Stability Commitment (New)
The draft adds a provision that core area boundaries and stipulations will not be altered for a minimum of five years from the order's effective date, absent compelling new information. This didn't exist in EO 2019-3 and would be a meaningful certainty gain for operators once in effect.
Valid Existing Rights — Extended Cutoff
EO 2019-3 grandfathered activities permitted before August 1, 2008 (or before July 29, 2015 for areas added by EO 2015-4). The draft adds a third tier: activities permitted before the new EO's effective date are similarly grandfathered within any Core Area newly added by this 2026 order.
Formalized Adaptive Management Process
The draft establishes a structured Adaptive Management Working Group and Technical Team process, with an annual October 1 review deadline and defined escalation steps — continued monitoring, recommendations, and emergency recommendations. This process was referenced more loosely in 2019-3.
Expanded Habitat & Reclamation Definitions
The habitat appendix is substantially more detailed — specific measurement methodology (the Line-Intercept method for sagebrush canopy cover), a 275-meter brood-rearing buffer standard, a 60-meter reclamation-adjacency threshold, and defined "suitable / transitional / disturbed / unsuitable" habitat tiers with numeric triggers. This is a tightened technical standard compared to the shorter 2019-3 version.
Updated Federal Coordination References
The draft incorporates the 2025 BLM Resource Management Plan Amendments and the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service's 2025 revised Section 10 policy — Conservation Benefit Agreements replacing new CCAAs/CCAs — reflecting the current federal regulatory posture.
Well Pad Density Figure — Needs Confirmation
The draft states oil and gas well pad density should not exceed 12 pads within a 2-mile radius of an occupied lek. This is a different pairing than the commonly cited "11 pads within 1.9 miles" figure under 2019-3. We recommend treating this as unconfirmed until the signed final version is issued.
What's Staying the Same
- Core Area 5% surface disturbance / 1 well pad per 640 acres density threshold
- 0.6-mile No Surface Occupancy (NSO) buffer around occupied leks in Core Areas; 0.25-mile NSO in Non-Core
- July 1 – March 14 seasonal timing limitation window in Core Areas
- 10 dB noise threshold above baseline during breeding season (March 1 – May 15)
- The Density and Disturbance Calculation Tool (DDCT) remains the operative screening and compliance tool
- Wind and solar development continues to be discouraged in Core Population Areas
What This Means for Your Projects
- No immediate action is required — EO 2019-3 governs all current permitting until a final order is signed.
- The draft does not loosen development stipulations; the expanded core area map and tightened habitat definitions, if anything, add conservatism.
- The five-year stability commitment, once in effect, is the clearest planning benefit — it would lock in boundaries and stipulations for a defined window.
- Operators siting projects near existing Core Area edges — particularly in the Powder River Basin and Moneta areas — should factor in a possible boundary shift.
Progressive Consulting is tracking this rulemaking and will update this page when the final Executive Order is signed. Have questions about how this may affect a specific project? Get in touch with our team.
Questions About How This Affects Your Project?
Related Posts
NMOCD 2023 Northwest Bradenhead Test Schedule Deadline 10.30.23
As a reminder, the deadline for “Area A” bradenhead tests is this coming Monday, October 30th, 2023. (All tests and forms submitted by November 1st) • Township 32 North, Ranges 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 West• Township 31 North, Ranges 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 West • Township 30 North, Ranges […]
Streamlining Flowline Compliance: How We Can Help You Navigate ECMC (Colorado) Regulatory Requirements
The management of flowlines in the oil and gas industry is a complex task, often subject to stringent regulatory requirements. Whether you are already operating a flowline system or planning to establish one, ensuring compliance with these regulations is crucial to avoid legal and environmental issues. In this article, we will outline how our services […
Utah’s New Oil and Gas Bonding Rules Are Live. Here’s What Operators Should Be Checking Now.
Progressive Insights · Regulatory Analysis By: Ashley Noonan | Last updated: August 10, 2026 The first overhaul of Utah’s financial assurance program in more than two decades took effect July 8 — and the Division’s bonding assessment letters are going out now. On July 8, 2026, Utah’s updated oil and gas bonding require
